What is the 72 hour first right of refusal?

Demystifying the 72-Hour First Right of Refusal: What You Need to Know

The 72-hour first right of refusal is a clause in a real estate contract that grants a buyer a defined window, typically 72 hours, to match a competing offer and secure the property, essentially preventing the seller from accepting the new offer immediately. Understanding this clause is crucial for both buyers and sellers navigating the real estate market.

Understanding the First Right of Refusal

The first right of refusal (FROR), in general, is a contractual agreement. It gives a party the first opportunity to purchase a property if the owner decides to sell. While the 72-hour clause is common, it’s important to understand the context in which it’s usually applied: contingent offers.

Imagine a buyer making an offer contingent on the sale of their existing home. The seller might accept the offer but include a 72-hour FROR. This protects the seller: if another, stronger, offer comes along, the original buyer has 72 hours to remove their contingency and proceed with the purchase, or the seller is free to accept the new offer.

Benefits of the 72-Hour Clause

The 72-hour clause offers benefits for both sellers and buyers, though the balance of power shifts depending on market conditions.

  • For Sellers:

    • Allows flexibility: They can accept a contingent offer without feeling locked in.
    • Maximizes potential sale price: It invites competition and potentially higher bids.
    • Reduces risk of prolonged listing: If the first buyer can’t perform, the seller isn’t unduly delayed.
  • For Buyers:

    • Opportunity to secure the property: Even with a contingent offer, they have a chance to purchase.
    • Provides time for decision-making: They are given a specified timeframe to evaluate their options.
    • Can potentially outbid competing offers: They can assess the market and make a competitive counter-offer.

The 72-Hour Right of Refusal Process

The process is usually straightforward:

  1. The seller receives a new, acceptable offer.
  2. The seller notifies the buyer with the first right of refusal in writing, providing details of the new offer (price, terms, etc.).
  3. The buyer has exactly 72 hours (or the time specified in the contract) to decide whether to waive their contingency and proceed with the original contract or terminate the original contract.
  4. If the buyer waives the contingency and agrees to proceed, the original contract remains in effect.
  5. If the buyer fails to respond within 72 hours, the seller is free to accept the new offer. Silence is generally considered a rejection.

Common Mistakes and Pitfalls

Navigating a 72-hour first right of refusal can be tricky. Here are some common pitfalls:

  • Misunderstanding the Timeline: Precisely calculate the 72-hour period. It starts the moment the buyer receives official notification, and weekends/holidays are typically included unless specifically stated otherwise in the agreement.
  • Failing to Secure Financing: Buyers with contingencies often haven’t finalized financing. They must be prepared to secure funding immediately if they want to exercise their right.
  • Ignoring Legal Advice: Consulting a real estate attorney is crucial. They can review the contract and ensure your rights are protected.
  • Sellers Failing to Provide Adequate Notice: The notification must be clear, complete, and delivered as specified in the contract. Ambiguous or incomplete notice can lead to legal challenges.
  • Buyers Overpaying Out of Panic: The pressure of the 72-hour window can lead to rash decisions. Carefully assess the property’s value before matching or exceeding the competing offer.

Important Considerations

Beyond the basic mechanics, several factors can influence the effectiveness of a 72-hour FROR.

  • Market Conditions: In a seller’s market, these clauses are more common, as sellers have more leverage.
  • Specific Contract Language: The specific wording of the contract is paramount. Pay close attention to the definition of “acceptable offer,” notification procedures, and consequences of non-response.
  • State Laws: Real estate laws vary by state. Consulting with a local real estate professional is essential.
Feature Description
———————- —————————————————————————————————
Purpose Allows seller to accept contingent offer while maintaining flexibility to accept better offers.
Trigger Receipt of a new, acceptable offer by the seller.
Timeframe Typically 72 hours (but can vary), strictly enforced.
Buyer’s Options Waive contingency and proceed with original contract; terminate original contract.
Seller’s Action Provide timely, complete, and compliant notification to the buyer with the first right of refusal.
Consequences Failure to act within the timeframe results in losing the right to purchase.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What constitutes an “acceptable offer” that triggers the 72-hour clause?

An “acceptable offer” is typically defined within the original contract. It usually means an offer that the seller is willing to accept, considering factors such as price, contingencies (other than the one subject to the 72 hour clause), closing date, and other terms. However, sellers can’t use trivial differences to trigger the clause; the offer needs to be genuinely better.

Does the 72-hour period include weekends and holidays?

Generally, yes. Unless the contract specifically states otherwise, the 72-hour period runs continuously, including weekends and holidays. It is absolutely crucial to verify this in the initial contract to prevent misunderstanding.

What happens if the buyer cannot secure financing within the 72-hour period?

If the buyer cannot secure financing within the 72-hour period and cannot waive the financing contingency, they will likely have to decline to proceed. This would allow the seller to accept the new offer. The buyer may potentially lose any earnest money deposits depending on the contract’s specifics.

Is the 72-hour clause negotiable?

Yes, most contract terms are negotiable. A buyer could negotiate for a longer period (e.g., 96 hours) or attempt to remove the clause altogether. The success of these negotiations depends on market conditions and the seller’s willingness to compromise.

Can a seller extend the 72-hour period?

The seller can choose to extend the 72-hour period. However, they are not obligated to do so. Any extension should be documented in writing and signed by both parties to avoid future disputes.

What if the competing offer falls through after the 72-hour period expires?

If the buyer with the first right of refusal declines to proceed and the competing offer subsequently falls through, the seller is not automatically obligated to re-offer the property to the original buyer. They can relist the property and solicit new offers.

How is the notification of a competing offer typically delivered?

The contract usually specifies the method of notification. Common methods include certified mail, email with confirmation receipt, or personal delivery. It is critically important to adhere to the specified method to ensure valid notification.

Does the buyer have to match the new offer exactly, or can they offer slightly less?

The contract typically requires the buyer to match the offer exactly. However, in some cases, the contract might specify that the buyer must match the “net” offer to the seller, accounting for differences in closing costs or other terms. This needs to be explicitly stated in the agreement.

What happens if the original buyer has made improvements to the property prior to the 72-hour clause being triggered?

The contract should address what happens to any improvements made by the original buyer. Often, the buyer and seller will need to negotiate reimbursement for those improvements. Without a prior agreement, this can be a contentious issue.

Can the seller accept a backup offer even after the buyer exercises their right of first refusal?

In most instances, once the original buyer exercises their right of first refusal and proceeds with the contract, the seller cannot accept backup offers. The original contract is back in effect.

What legal recourse does a buyer have if the seller violates the 72-hour first right of refusal?

If the seller violates the 72-hour clause by accepting another offer prematurely, the buyer may have grounds for legal action, such as a lawsuit for breach of contract. The buyer might seek specific performance (forcing the seller to sell them the property) or monetary damages.

Is a 72-hour right of first refusal common in all real estate transactions?

No, the 72-hour first right of refusal is not a standard clause in all real estate transactions. It is most frequently used when the seller is accepting an offer with contingencies, like the buyer needing to sell their existing home. Its prevalence can also vary depending on local market practices and customs.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top